Slack is for chats, Teams is for video calls
So, for total engagement over 60 days (measuring for someday, every week, a month, and two months), wherein “engagement” is outlined as logging in and sending a message, Slack is a transparent winner, getting more than double the engagement in comparison with Teams.Measuring for a day, 37% of Slack customers engaged with the platform, in comparison with 14% of Teams customers. Measuring for 2 months, alternatively, has proven 83% for Slack customers, and 42% for Teams customers. Similar figures are for group messages, as 92% of engaged customers in Slack used the characteristic over the course of 30 days, whereas simply 11% of Teams customers did the identical.When it involves attending conferences, nonetheless, Teams excels, whereas Slack lags behind. Measuring for a single day, simply 2% of Slack customers logged in for the characteristic, in comparison with 46% of Teams customers. For 30 days, it’s 12% and 62%, respectively.Among the doable causes for this discrepancy, Productiv believes, is the truth that Teams comes bundled with, and is built-in nicely, with Outlook. Microsoft has additionally “heavily advertised” the video conferencing characteristic in its Teams platform, whereas many Slack customers may not be totally conscious of their platform providing the identical performance.Finally, it may very well be attributable to many Slack customers already very used to Zoom for video conferencing, Productiv concluded.